Wall Street Analysts: WellPoint (and the rest of the insurance companies) would benefit most if reform fails
Posted on March 5th, 2010 by Jason Rosenbaum in Profits Before People|
|
Yesterday, Ezra Klein got a hold of an exclusive report by Cowen and Co., a Wall Street investment bank. Their stock analysts concluded what we've know all along. From the report:
"Of course, healthcare reform is a double-edged sword for Wellpoint shares. Should reform fail, Wellpoint would be a primary beneficiary."
This analysis tracks closely with what Goldman Sachs told the rest of the insurance industry back in November:
A study put together by Goldman in mid-October looks at the estimated stock performance of the private insurance industry under four variations of reform legislation. The study focused on the five biggest insurers whose shares are traded on Wall Street: Aetna, UnitedHealth, WellPoint, CIGNA and Humana.
…What the firm sees as the best path forward for the private insurance industry's bottom line is, to be blunt, inaction.
The study's authors advise that if no reform is passed, earnings per share would grow an estimated ten percent from 2010 through 2019, and the value of the stock would rise an estimated 59 percent during that time period.
And Goldman-affiliated analysts implicitly endorsed this view on a recent conference call for investors by saying the insurance industry's business model going forward was going to be about cutting customers and making more profits as the industry keeps consolidating:
The market concentration for health insurance is so monopolized in some areas that insurance companies are willing to raise prices and lose customers in an effort to improve their bottom line, a leading insurance broker told Wall Street analysts on Wednesday.
In a conference call organized by Goldman Sachs Global Investment Research, Steve Lewis, a highly regarded broker at the financial consulting firm Willis, painted a picture of the health insurance market in which consumers seem likely to be priced out of coverage.
Noting that "price competition" between insurers was "down from a year ago," Lewis relayed that "incumbent carriers seem more willing than ever to walk away from existing business."
The best thing for the insurance industry, according to Wall Street analysts, is business as usual. It will allow insurers to keep consolidating their monopolies, keep pricing sick customers out of the market, and thus keep increasing their already record profits.
And the insurance industry clearly believes the analysis - they laundered between $10 and $20 million through the Chamber of Commerce for misleading attack ads designed to kill reform. And their army lobbyists, which cost millions per day, certainly aren't telling lawmakers to pass a bill.
The people, on the other hand, not only need a health reform bill, but they need the right one. And there's a way to get it done.
Reconciliation is gathering steam in the Senate. 47 Senators are on board or very open to the idea, and enough others have indicated openness to bring the tally above 50. And the package of fixes done through reconciliation needs to include measures to make health care more affordable for everyone and hold insurance companies accountable.
Congress needs to understand that not passing a bill is giving the insurance companies exactly what they want and dooming their constituents to more denials of care, more medical bankruptcies, and more deaths because people can't afford insurance. Congress needs to listen to us instead and pass something that works for the American people.
Please look at (or listen to, or read the transcript of) the PBS program - - Bill Moyers' Journal of March 5, 2010. He interviews Wendell Potter (former CIGNA VP, who had an epiphany viewing an open-air HC clinic in Appalachia with its rows of patients awaiting the only medical care they can acquire) and Dr. Marcia Angell (Harvard medical lecturer and former Editor-in-Chief of NE Journal of Medicine).
He asks pointed questions of both about "the President's current health bill" and they have different opinions on whether or not it deserves congressional vote support.
Surprising to me, I came to the conclusion that it SHOULD NOT BE PASSED without substantive additions and changes. You may reach opposite conclusions.
Make up your own minds, readers, but PLEASE listen to both critiques beforehand.
I saw the program, and the idea that we should vote this down because then we'll get single payer is political fantasy.
It may be that business as usual is most profitable for the insurance industry, but it is also more beneficial to Americans than the implementation of reform legislation.
Perhaps the study delves deep enough to consider non-legislative reform (the type that the healthcare industry is working on by itself), but the language presented in the first excerpt suggests it's not even in the writers' scopes, as though the bills under consideration at present were the only possibility in the universe of healthcare and insurance reform. There's a red flag for skewed reasoning.
Pointing out that private industry stands to profit under the current situation does not entail that the legislation that hurts that industry is beneficial to Americans.
Proof?
Let's not be fooled and become knowledgeable about President Obama's health care plan and the Republican's health care plan that's available for all to see on the internet. You compare and you decide which plan is best for the American people! We perish for a lack of knowledge!!!!
Please get the true fact about what health reform will mean!!!!
Glad you asked for analysis of the Republican plan. Here you go:
http://blog.healthcareforamericanow.org/2010/02/25/white-house-health-care-summit-morning-wrap-up-tort-reform-insurance-costs-and-republican-ideas/
http://blog.healthcareforamericanow.org/2010/02/25/white-house-health-care-summit-afternoon-roundup-hsas-state-lines-and-polling/
To put it mildly, Republican ideas do nothing.